what do you think it means to “pay thy debt, and live” (2 kings 4:7)? lds

Should the NL adopt the DH?

This calendar week, MLB players' union leader Tony Clark said that he expected the issue of extending the designated hitter to the National League to come up up in the 2016 commonage bargaining round. Baseball adopted Rule 6.ten which permitted leagues to allow designated hitters. The American League chose to do that beginning in 1973. Opinions (100 words maximum) from every author on the Redleg Nation staff:

Aye

Joe Atkinson: The DH is coming to the National League. It's inevitable, and has been since Interleague play became a daily role of MLB life. Having 2 teams from two leagues that play by two dissimilar rules go head-to-head every day ways at least 1 squad is playing at a disadvantage every twenty-four hour period. In that sense, I am fine with MLB instituting the dominion league-wide. Would I prefer it went the other way and banned the DH altogether? Absolutely. Just in a earth where the boilerplate fan craves crime and decries pitcher's duels as "dull," that will never happen.

Jeremy Conley: I’chiliad the exception in this fence. I used to recall I could never take the DH in the NL, and at present I’ve changed sides. Growing up, I liked the differences in the leagues, but interleague games ruined that already; baseball isn’t a game for purists anymore. Once I let become of the notion that the leagues are different, the DH made sense. It increases criminal offense, prevents injuries by letting players become residue, and it lets managers be flexible with their rosters. Yous lose some double switches, but I’d rather see players win games than managers lose them with bonehead moves.

Greg Dafler: ÂÂI've been at peace with the NL adopting the DH rule since they announced 15 team leagues and yr-circular interleague play back in late 2011. This rule isn't just about the NL versus the AL. None of the pocket-sized league affiliates follow the NL rule. Major League Baseball is in a situation where they ask loftier school and higher kids to Not bat (or rarely bat) for a few years of pitching development before being asked to pace to the plate confronting major league caliber pitchers. It is time for the NL to have pitchers out of the batters box.

Tom Diesman: I would exist a more staunch supporter of the contrary, removing the DH from the AL.  That however will never be allowed past the players union.  That said, I support the addition of the DH in the NL.  The reasons beingness, to level the playing field between the teams during interleague play and to hopefully force the Reds current GM to actually find a legitimate bat for the bench since they currently are inept at demote building and leave themselves at an extreme disadvantage versus AL clubs when the DH is used.

Mark Elliott: Equally a NL fan, I loved the mystery of the differences between the leagues. John Kruk bailing out of the batter’south box against Randy Johnson in the ’93 ASG is nonetheless one of my favorite baseball moments. But with interleague play at present every solar day, that mystery is long gone. It is fourth dimension to standardize the game. (Wanna bet that a proposal for a 26 man active roster shows upwards at the same fourth dimension?)

Jeremy Forbes: I similar the idea of making the pitchers fight in their at bats, and the strategy it adds to games, but there's one number that makes me retrieve the NL needs to adopt the DH. Eleven. As in eleven directly years that the AL has had a winning tape against the NL in Interleague Play. The departure betwixt an NL and AL bullpen batting isn't much, but the departure between an AL DH and an NL demote actor is much greater. There's no manner the AL will get rid of the DH, and then the NL really has no other selection.

Greg Gajus: Despite being terrified of seeing a Reds lineup with "Skip Schumacher – DH" I am for information technology. 1) Having two unlike rules is a featherbrained relic of the 1970's. 2) In a bunt state of affairs, the pitcher bunts. Starters that are losing in late innings are pinch hit for.  Where is the strategy? Does the revered double switch thing much? 3) The team edifice strategy is interesting. Observe an Adam Dunn? Use it to rest regulars? Devin Mesoraco, 120 games caught, 150 games played? Put together a platoon? Trading the DH for Super Twos would be a adept deal for the owners.

Doug Gray: At that place is no hazard that MLB will eliminate the DH position, so information technology would exist great for the NL to prefer information technology. The DH in the AL allows that league to sign players to longer contracts considering later in their careers they tin slide them to DH. It gives them an advantage in free agency and allows the entire league to compile talent that the NL just can't do, or if they tin can, they do and then with more risk.

Mike Maffie: Having the DH in the AL but not the NL reminds me more than of a John Oliver, â€Å" How’s this still a thing” than a rule in a major professional sport. It complicates cross-league comparisons, influences the labor marketplace, and has at least a marginal event on the season and postseason outcomes. Could I be convinced that every actor should bat? Sure. Could I be convinced that the pitcher’s position is purely defensive and having them bat is boring and bad for baseball? Certain. I don’t care which side of the fence baseball game is on; I merely prefer it not be in the center.

Steve Mancuso: I'm for annihilation that would avoid me having to sentry Aaron Harang striking.

Middle of the Road

Taylor Ballinger: It’s inevitable. With season-long interleague play, teams can’t play by different sets of rules from series to series. The DH allows players to extend their careers, so it’s not going abroad. Simply one time, when I was six, when Tom Browning came upwards to bat, â€Å"He’south gonna hit a dwelling house run,” I proclaimed. â€Å"He’s a pitcher, they don’t….” My dad’due south phonation trailed off every bit Browning crushed ane into the night heaven. I danced around the living room. I’ve made that guess about Reds pitchers countless times. I’ve never been right since. There’south a reason, but I sure will miss dreaming…Kevin Michell: The National League adopting the designated hitter is something that makes sense but goes against one of nice quirks of baseball- the unique difference of how the NL game is played. I think pitchers hitting is "truthful baseball" in a sense, but if the Reds were playing with a DH, costless amanuensis shopping would be a heck of a lot easier. Consistency in the game is important to a lot of people (me, not so much) and the MLBPA won't be going back to a globe without a DH,  and then this simply seems an inevitability.

NoÂÂ

Nick Carrington: The NL adopting the designated hitter seems inevitable, and I’ve always found information technology strange that the two leagues play under different rules. But that doesn’t hateful I want the DH in the NL or think it’s a good idea. I enjoy the strategy forced upon a manager when the pitcher is batting. Also, the DH is not what it used to exist. We aren't seeing many Frank Thomas or Edgar Martinez type hitters in that spot anymore. Instead, we are graced with players like Logan Morrison and teams rotating players.  Does that audio appealing to yous?

Nick Doran: Real baseball players play defense. If a histrion is too fat, onetime or clumsy to catch a baseball game and so he doesn't vest on the diamond. Running, throwing, diving and leaping are required skills for baseball players. Take abroad the need to play in the field and you stop up with fat, lazy, non-able-bodied players who would be more than at home in a bowling aisle or a golf course than on the hallowed grounds of a baseball field.

Wesley Jenkins:ÂÂAs a pitcher for nearly the entirety of my lengthy but uneventful baseball career, the possible add-on of the DH to the NL would seem to be a long awaited development. There is null almost pitchers hate more than than having to fend for themselves at the plate. But even so I would withal rather the DH stay out of the National League. Without a DH, at that place is so much more strategy to the game. Especially equally a bullpen, I appreciate the intricacies of a low scoring game. More criminal offence is not always the best solution.

Nick Kirby: One great thing that separates MLB from other sports is the two leagues play with different rules. It is fun and intriguing to see the managers piece of work the game differently, DH's play in the field, AL pitchers hit, and debate which NL player will DH for three days. Baseball keeps its tradition. While I am for improving the game, I don't think the DH does that. The DH in the NL would hurt a smaller market squad similar the Reds. If they had to pay for some other hitter, it would only hurt the Reds from competing with the bigger spenders.

Matt Korte: Every bit a player, I would love it. As a fan of the game I hate it. As a Reds fan, this would be terrible. The Dodgers or Cubs, teams with big dollars to spend, will add another big bat to their lineup. Simply teams like the Reds, already cash-strapped, tin barely put together eight solid hitters let lone ix. Because of the money players will earn and the careers this will extend, I recollect the DH in the NL is near a certainty. Simply equally a applied Reds fan, this would put us at a major disadvantage.

Jason Lawrence:ÂÂ"I grew up watching mostly National League baseball game, so pitchers batting and the strategy that comes with it (bunting, pinch-hitting, double-switching, etc.) is an essential and interesting part of the game to me. American League baseball has always felt a petty more sterile and predictable, but I bask the pocket-size distinction between the two leagues. On the other mitt, if MLB plans to implement rules to quicken the game and increase offense, a designated hitter in the National League seems more natural than forcing relievers to face 2 or more batters."

Jason Linden: I don't want the DH in the NL, merely I don't have any good reasons. What it comes down to is that baseball is a game. Games are supposed to be fun. They are supposed to entertain. I've always thought the DH was kind of boring, but I also like the quirk of dissimilar rules in dissimilar leagues. I think having no DH makes things a piddling more entertaining. Merely in the end, information technology doesn't matter much. I similar things how they are, simply I'll become over it if there's a change.

Chris Wilson: Every bit a baseball purist, I don't want to see the DH added to the National League.  I would prefer to see the American League do away with it earlier seeing information technology implemented in the NL.  Unfortunately, it appears to be something that volition happen sooner or subsequently.  I know it will modify the landscape of how the franchise signs players, only the Reds accept not exactly been deep in the terms of potential DH types in recent seasons.

That'south what we recollect, Nation, what say y'all, should the NL adopt the DH rule?

kivireaterem2002.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.redlegnation.com/2015/03/15/staff-opinion-should-the-nl-adopt-the-dh/

Bagikan Artikel ini